Question 1

Why do finance, IT, and procurement have different information for the same vendor, and how can they view a single data set?

Accepted Answer

Most legacy systems and protocols were designed so that IT, finance, and procurement teams tracked vendor details in different systems built for different jobs, which is why the same question about a vendor can produce three different sets of answers depending on who’s asked. At one time it made sense to split vendor management so finance managed the spend ledger, IT managed the asset inventory, and procurement managed the contract terms, but today disparate systems and mismatched data create dysfunction. Since the legacy systems and protocols in large organizations can be tough to rebuild completely, the solution is a platform that bridges the existing systems and reconciles the pieces of information therein into a single data set. When teams have a single source of truth and complete visibility into a vendor’s relationship at the enterprise level, they make better, more strategic decisions on what’s next.

Question 2

How can our teams minimize AI sprawl, and what are best practices in proving AI ROI?

Accepted Answer

AI spend is originating in more places than most tracking systems can catch: unsanctioned purchases, usage-based features embedded in existing software, vendor contracts with automatic AI add-ons, and tools purchased independently across teams. This “AI sprawl” flourished because many companies developed mandates for teams to adopt AI and report utilization rates. The adoption rush spurred token maxing and sent utilization skyrocketing without clear data on value. AI ROI is even harder to prove than traditional tech profitability because usage-based pricing makes the cost structure volatile. When the investment itself keeps changing, the formula for determining return on that investment is never really accurate. Best practices include a system that wrangles AI sprawl, identifies token usage value — not just flat token usage — and spots AI add-ons buried in standing vendor contracts. When the scope of enterprise AI is clear and the investment is accurately calculated, organizations have the financial discipline in place to formulate ROI.

Question 3

Why is IT shadow spend so common, and how can it be solved?

Accepted Answer

Gartner reported that 74 percent of IT purchases are funded all or in part by business units outside of IT, easily triggering shadow spend. With tech decisions flattening across the organization, the practical implications of IT-related decisions can get missed – and even become buyer’s remorse. Gartner also reports that the majority of enterprise tech purchases come with a “high degree of regret,” according to a 2022 survey. On top of decision fragmentation, legacy silos in large companies have inadvertently fostered shadow spend mechanisms like tools purchased on corporate cards but not centrally tracked, and duplicate systems purchased through line of business budgets but not routed through procurement. The solution is creating a single source of truth that catches and tracks all sources of IT spend across the entire enterprise, identifies spend at a functional level, and empowers teams to make strategic decisions with 360° visibility into their IT estate.

Question 4

What should an IT asset management platform actually track?

Accepted Answer

A useful platform tracks more than a static list of what a company owns and instead provides insight into the entire lifecycle of IT assets across the enterprise. At a minimum, it needs a centralized inventory covering hardware, software, and SaaS licenses in one system of record; automated discovery that finds what’s actually running rather than relying on someone to log it manually; license utilization data showing which seats are active versus paid for but idle; and renewal dates tied directly to the underlying contract terms, not a separate calendar. The gap in most setups isn’t the inventory, as most companies have a list of vendors. The gap is connecting that list to usage and contract data so the list informs a strategic, data-informed decision: renew, renegotiate, downsize, or cut. Inventory without that connective layer is just a longer spreadsheet that becomes quickly outdated.

Question 5

Why do surprise tech and vendor renewals happen so often, and how can they be prevented?

Accepted Answer

Many vendor contracts are structured with the vendor’s own renewal cycle in mind, which may mean a limited client notice window, auto-renewal clauses that lock in the current term by default, and/or pricing that can step up or add new charges at renewal without a fresh negotiation. In other words, the onus of managing the renewal lands on the client company. Internally, surprises pop up from unintentional breaks across business units: procurement negotiated the contract terms, IT implemented the tool, and finance signed off on the budget outlay, but no one has full visibility into the renewal cycle. The fix isn’t expecting vendors to change how they structure renewals, the fix is using a system that identifies upcoming renewals 180 days out, giving teams time to vet whether the renewal is needed, and if so, time to renegotiate from a place of strength.

Question 6

Typical spend reports show only what was already spent – how can they be updated to inform what to do next?

Accepted Answer

A typical spend report is an export from an accounting system: vendor names, dollar amounts, a total at the bottom. In other words, spend reports were built to track history, not offer insight into the future. The report can tell you a vendor invoiced $1.2 million last year, but not whether that’s competitive, when the contract is up for renewal, or whether another vendor contract exists in the same category. A spend report that informs the future tracks spend at the enterprise level, not just by department, and provides details on contracts approaching renewal within the next 180 days, categories where combined volume could mean better terms, and functional duplications that can be trimmed and repurposed into open budget. With the addition of human expertise to interpret the data in context of the company’s strategic plans, a spend report goes from static history to strategic leverage.

Overviews, news, and answers.

Platform overviews

Advisor Overview

What we’re reading

I Helped Run Lululemon. The A.I. Revolution Is a Hot Mess.

Conversations with Rubicon

Finance